Upland Plant Communities of San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties
"A traveler should be a botanist, for in all views,
plants form the chief embellishment." —Charles
Darwin
Upland plant communities have a profound effect on watershed processes and function. Vegetation influences the physical processes of water movement, nutrient mobilization, and soil deposition, and is also the foundation for various ecological interactions including the formation of terrestrial and aquatic food webs and habitat (FISRWG 1998). Disturbances within plant communities may result in alterations to the flow patterns of surface and belowground water, soil composition, and nutrient deposition, which in turn lead to changes in water quantity and quality, stream structure, sedimentation rate, and nutrient balance.
Plant Communities
A plant community is "an assemblage of plants with similar
or complementary ranges of tolerances to various environmental
factors" (Thomas 1961). Ecologists define plant communities
based on a wide range of criteria, including physical traits
such as climate and soil type, and biological attributes such
as species composition, richness, abundance, plant density, structure,
and spatial and temporal dynamics. Plant community ecologists
study the interactions between biological features in plant communities
(for example, competition among organisms, plant-herbivore relationships)
as well as the influence of various abiotic features on individuals
and groups of plants.
San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties are home to a rich tapestry
of plant communities, ranging from salt marsh to chaparral to
redwood forest. Riparian plant communities occupy a relatively
small percentage of the watershed (less than 5 percent) (RHJV 2000),
yet play a profound role in supporting biological diversity in
both the aquatic and terrestrial environment. Land cover mapping
and associated vegetation community identification is often completed
at scales which do not identify site-specific attributes of plant
communities – such as density, population size, and so forth. These
mapping efforts are useful for larger scale planning, but should
be coupled with detailed mapping for watershed management and
planning.
 |
Marsh habitat associated with the estuary at Scott Creek. |
Beginning in the higher elevations of the Santa Cruz Mountains,
a typical stream might pass through chaparral, grassland, oak
woodland or redwood forest communities before reaching tidal
marshes and its eventual confluence with the Pacific Ocean or
the San Francisco Bay. Specific plant community types develop
in response to physical and environmental conditions. Geology,
soil characteristics, topography, and climatic conditions shape
plant community development (Thomas 1961). However, once established,
plant communities affect soil condition and microclimate. Communities
differ in their capacity to hold soils and reduce erosional processes
(FISWRG 1998). While some communities are strong stabilizing
forces, others may be easily disturbed by human activity, such
as the sand
hills of Santa Cruz. Highly disturbed
habitat loses its ability to provide beneficial ecosystem functions
such as erosion control. Water availability is also influenced
by community type, with communities differing in water uptake
as well as control of water movement (see the Hydrology section
for more information) (FISWRG 1998). Upland plant communities
affect aquatic and riparian systems, and should be considered
when developing watershed management plans.
Plant Community Classification
Numerous plant community classifications have been proposed
for California, but no single system is widely accepted. One
of the most current and detailed systems is described in A
Manual of California Vegetation (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf
1995). This system of classifying vegetation was developed by
the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) and is gradually being
adopted as the standard by many federal, state, and private entities.
At this time, however, vegetation maps and spatial data that
use the CNPS system are not available for San Mateo and Santa
Cruz Counties.
Over the years, geographic information system (GIS) mapping has incorporated
a number of land cover / land use classification systems that include coverage
of the area. A few of these include CalVeg2000, California Department of Forestry
and Fire Protection; 1998 GAP Analysis, UC Santa Barbara; Coastal Change and
Analysis Program (C-CAP), NOAA; and Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program,
State of California Department of Conservation. To access some
of these GIS data sets for San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties,
visit the SRP GIS
Data Inventory / Data Download.
 |
|
This map reflects 2002 multisource land cover
data from the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection.
|
Working in concert under a collaborative Cooperative Vegetation
and Habitat Mapping and Classification memorandum of understanding
(MOU), comprehensive vegetation and habitat mapping efforts are
currently under development. These efforts will refine existing
classification systems and provide more detailed information
about the Central Coast plant communities. Visit the following
Web sites for more information:
References
Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG).
1998. "Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes,
and Practices." Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working
Group (FISRWG). GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653.
ISBN-0-934213-59-3. View
on-line document.
Riparian Habitat Joint Venture (RHJV). 2000. "Version 1.0. The
Riparian Bird Conservation Plan: a strategy for reversing the
decline of riparian associated birds in California." California
Partners in Flight. View
on-line document.
Sawyer, J.O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A
Manual of California Vegetation. Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society.
Thomas, J.H. 1961. Flora of the Santa Cruz Mountains of
California. A Manual of the Vascular Plants. Stanford,
CA: Stanford University Press.
Back to top
|